A few weeks ago I got to go on an excursion to the zoo with my son's Year 1 class. Altogether, there were three classes from his school on the excursion, each with 20 or so kids and 4 adults supervising (1 teacher and 3 parents).
Each of the three teachers followed a different approach in deploying their supervision resources to look after the kids:
1. In one class, the four adults walked with the group, in no particular formation, and stopped occasionally to count them to make sure we hadn't lost any yet. (Yep, crazy, I know. Thankfully, all the kids were still there when they counted them onto the bus at the end of the day, and no-one got eaten by the crocodiles...)
2. In the second class (the one I was with) the teacher got the kids into a sort of line formation, each with a 'buddy' they were responsible for, and the four adults walked along with them in that formation.
3. In the third class, each adult was allocated to about 5 kids that they were particularly responsible for.
As we herded the kids through the zoo from enclosure to enclosure, I got to thinking about the way we look after each other in church. At the risk of sounding kinda Forrest-Gump-ish, life is a bit like a big zoo trip - lots to learn, lots to see, crowds everywhere, lots to get distracted by, easy to get lost...
And one of the reasons why God has put us together as a church is to help us make our way through the big zoo without getting lost or missing the things we were meant to see and do. If you decide to do it in a big group (and trust me, for a day-trip to the zoo, 20 is a big group!) then it helps to have some sort of system where the leaders know which five kids they are aiming to keep out of the mouths of the crocodiles.
There were pluses in model 2 (it was good for the kids take some responsibility for each other, and one other kid was probably enough for them to have to keep an eye out for!), but I have confess I was a little envious of the parents in the class that was following model 3.

There are real benefits, of course, in those four little groups of 5 still hanging together in a big group of 20. It was good for the four of us looking after Jacob's class to have some mutual accountability in making sure we kept with the programme and didn't do anything untoward with the kids, for example. And since the teacher was the one who had spent her school holidays researching chimpanzees and hippos, and she was going to be the main one doing the follow-up lessons with the class over the next few weeks, then it made sense that she got to draw up the route with her texta on the zoo map and get us all together from time to time to point out something particularly important in the pachyderm enclosure or give us a little talk about chimpanzee communication.
But at that basic, keeping-kids-out-of-the-mouths-of-crocodiles level (and at the level of helping them to process what they were seeing and notice some things for themselves) having a group of five kids, knowing their names and faces and knowing I was responsible for them would have been a big plus!
Pics: The Library of Congress, and Andrew Michaels
Read more...