Tuesday, 27 October 2009

Why we don't homeschool...

Some time ago, my bloggy friend Melanie correctly inferred (from the other side of the world!) that I love teaching my kids, and - on the basis of that observation - asked me why we don't homeschool. I told her that I would answer her question once school went back.

That was the July school holidays. There's been another set of holidays since I said that.

I'm sorry Melanie!

The truth is that I've had a post in my drafts folder for all of term 3, but could never quite finish it. I think the reason I've hesitated so much is not because we haven't got a thought-through reason for our education decisions, but because I don't want people to misread this post as an anti-homeschooling rant. I don't have an absolute, in-principle position against homeschooling. I have many friends whom I admire and respect who have homeschooled (and in some cases still are homeschooling) their kids. It's something Dave and I have agreed we would consider if circumstances were such that we thought it necessary. But, for the time being, we obviously have made a different decision, and I am happy to share our reasons with the world!

We've decided to send our children to the local public school because:
  1. Our kids don't have any special needs that would require otherwise at the moment.
  2. Our local state school is a good school and the kids will be taught well there.
  3. There are a few other Christian families who also send their children to the school.
  4. We want our kids to learn how to be followers of Jesus in the midst of the world, and learn to love their non-Christian neighbours. We want them to desire the salvation of their friends - to pray for them, to talk to them about Jesus. We believe that this is at the heart of what it is to be a disciple of Jesus, and essential to what we need to teach them as parents.
We don't do this naively. A local public school will have its own secularism that is anti-Christian. The teachers usually don't (explicitly, systematically) share their religious views at primary school, but everything they do will still be informed in some way by their own personal beliefs. And on a larger scale, the curriculum and structures of the school will be intentionally (and appropriately!) secular, and frequently (and inappropriately!) informed by the secularism of the majority of the politicians and bureaucrats who oversee them. There will be all sorts of things that their teachers will say, out loud, about religion, sex, the environment, success, and so on, that are inconsistent with what the Bible says. And in addition, of course, there will be all the things they don't say; the six-hour-long silence, every day, in which they don't say anything about the God who made the world - all the things they think they can teach as if He was irrelevant. All of that is part of the deal, and we know that's the case!

So Dave and I don't just wave goodbye to our kids at the school gate and wish them luck! We pray with them, we talk about how they are to behave when they're there, we debrief in the afternoon when they get home and in the evening, when the stories finally come out. We try to get to know our kids' friends, to invite them round to our home to play, and to get to know their families. We aim to get involved in the life of the school - in the P & C, on the School council, in the classroom helping with reading - one day, maybe even Canteen duty! And we try to be vigilant with what happens at school, so that we don't just shrug our shoulders in resignation when things happen that are inconsistent with (good) policy.

There are still days when I do long to homeschool - but on days like that I try to remind myself that I am a homeschooler - just one who happens to send her kids out on a six-hour excursion to the local primary school for 200 or so days of the year. When they're off at school, we don't stop being responsible for them, and there are some vital things we need to teach them that would be very hard for them to learn without going there. (I don't mean maths and science and so on - I mean how to stand against the crowd, how to respect and obey non-Christian authorities, how to be overtly Christian in a non-Christian environment, and how to give an answer when they're asked about the reason for their hope.)

Our strategy is not to send them out into the minefields as child-soldiers, untrained and unarmed and unprepared. Our strategy is to send them out day by day, for part of the day, for part of the year, so that they will learn to be soldiers, both now and when they're grown up, and to do all we can to train and equip them along the way.

And in the meantime, Dave and I still have the chance to continue to teach our kids in many other ways out of school hours. There are plenty of hours in the rest of the day (and the rest of the year) to read, to discover the bugs in the backyard together, to go to museums, to play sport, to cook with them, to do science experiments, and so on. And there are plenty of hours for them to read the Scriptures that they get to put into practice when they're off at school, and to frame the school day in the light of God's word.

Our job as parents is to make the most of both their time and home and their secular schooling experiences, as opportunities to teach them about how to magnify Christ in all of life, in the midst of a world that doesn't know him.

15 comments:

Trevor Cairney said...

This is a great post Nic, like you I respect and admire those who do homeschool, but I like your justification for keeping your children in school. It's also important to note (as you have) that parents might well make different decisions depending on the circumstances of their children, the school and the family. Thanks.

Erin said...

thanks for writing this, it's an issue I have been thinking about a bit lately.

Stuart said...

Thanks for this, Nicole. It's a controversial topic, and not one I look forward to having to work out in concrete terms (not least because Suzanne and I had such different experiences of school).

There's a family in our church here who sent two to government schools, one to a non-government school, and one they homeschooled for a period. It was a good example of us of responding to different children's needs — 'justice' does not always mean 'equality'.

(Oh, and by the by, I think there's a typo on "position against anti-homeschooling".)

Melanie said...

Thanks Nicole! You didn't come across as anti-homeschooling at all! Your answer is a good reminder to those of us who do homeschool that even though we have made different choices regarding our children's education and may disagree on some of the finer points overall we have the same concerns for our children and have much, much more in common!

Nicole said...

Thanks for the tip off about the typo Stuart - that was a confusing sentence!! I've fixed it now.

Nicole said...

Thanks Stuart and dad - as my mum's always said "different courses for different horses"!!

And thanks Melanie,

I'm glad it didn't come across as a rant. And I agree that we do have a lot in common! :)

Bron said...

Thanks Nicole, I really appreciate this post and what you've said really resonates with me.

Something I've been wrestling with though is what to do when the school is far from ideal. We're hoping to do church planting in a really rough area and although I'm loath to send our kids elsewhere to school (because I think it's basically giving the message of this place isn't good enough')... I'm also terrified of sending kids to a really full on rough school.

Thankfully it's a bit in the future anyway - My baby girl is only 4 months old!

Sharon said...

Thanks for this post Nicole, it was clear and helpful.

Your reason number four resonates with us because that was one of the reasons why we changed Joshua from an all-Christian school (where at least one of the parents must be a "born again" Christian) to a Christian school that welcomes children from families with no Christian background. In his second school, where all the teachers are Christians, we have found that there is a better attitude towards modelling sharing the gospel in ways that are helpful for children. In the previous school, there did seem to be something of a Christians-under-siege mentality at times!

It has been an education for us considering the different environments, both physical, academic and spiritual and emotional that are provided by different schooling environments: whether homeschooling, away-schooling, or not-at-homeschooling (at the museum, the library, the zoo, the river...)

Have a great day.

~ Sharon

Michelle said...

Thanks for sharing! I've been looking forward to this post since it was mentioned in those holiday posts long ago!

I lean towards homeschooling at the moment (have for years) however it isn't a critical decision at this point - if the Lord blesses us with children it will be something to consider...

I did enjoy reading your post and it was gently written and certainly wasn't an "anti-homeschool" post!

Megan said...

Very much agree, and we have enrolled our eldest at the local public for next year - looking forward to it!

On another not unrelated note, I got some table talk/xtb notes now our eldest is 5. He is loving them - so much so that I find myself saying things like "No, eat your breakfast first, and then we can read the Bible" LOL

mel hayde said...

Thankyou!
There are options for schooling - home, public, private and christian. Each have pros and cons, and simply being aware of both the pros and cons of each decision is crucial. Then you are able to ensure you can adddress them. There is no one best answer for all.

allyson adeney said...

Great to see a though out approach to schooling which looks at lots of the elements that need to be considered.
It's worth considering the effect each option has on the parents and the rest of the family as well.
The conclusion that our job as parents is to make sure they are being taught the things of God and the way He thinks about the world is at the top of the 'goods' tree....everything else is optional.
Thanks NIc

Louise Blencowe said...

Thanks for your post Nic, I appreciate the time you and Dave put into working through these issues. It is good to think through the options.
I feel a bit like Bron (apprehensive with a local school with a 'rough' rep. And I married a wonderful strong Christian home-schooled boy!
But I remember how much I grew as a Christian through having to stand up for my beliefs at school. I would not be the person I am today without this experience.

Nicole said...

Hi everyone,

Thanks for all these extra comments - sorry it's taken a while to respond, it's been a busy 24 hours!

Bron, like Louise, I've been thinking about your comment. I agree that it's tricky if the local school is rough - and as I wrote the post, I was very conscious that with the lovely school we live near, we haven't really been tested in this respect (hence point 2)!

I did go to a high school with a (relatively) bad reputation, but I'm not sure how I'd go at sending our own kids to a rough school. I guess it depends as much on the kids and how resilient they are as it does on the school and how rough it is?

Beverley said...

I love the part where you say you are a homeschooler... just because your children go to school doesn't mean you are neglecting their education. For me I read that as being a natural learner, someone who has acknowledged that we are learning all the time, that education and life are not separated. John Holt, the guy who coined the term 'unschooling', wasn't against school per se, he was against forcing people to do things that didn't make sense. In your context your children attending school makes sense because it is a carefully considered thoughtful approach to education - school is simply an education resource your family and your children are choosing to use. The research tells us that the most important indicator in a child's education success is the degree to which the parents become involved with and take an interest in the education of their children. Hands-on, attentive parenting is a fantastic educational foundation for children.